Posts
NEW DELHI, October 15, 2012
"Sethusamudram with new alignment won’t serve purpose’’
J. VENKATESAN
Agreeing with the findings of the Dr. P. K. Pachauri Committee, the Tamil Nadu government told the Supreme Court on Monday that the Sethusamudram project would not serve any public purpose with the proposed alignment 4A without cutting through Ram Setu. At the resumed hearing of the Ram Setu case, a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad granted the government 6 more weeks, as sought by Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman, to decide whether the ancient Ram Setu could be declared a national monument, as sought by Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy in his petition.
In March, the court sought the Tamil Nadu government’s response to the committee’s report on exploring an alternative route to implement the project, which was yet to be accepted by the Centre. In its response, Tamil Nadu said that as per the panel report, the proposed alignment (4A) would have serious environmental repercussions during construction and operation, and the economic viability of the scheme, even going by optimistic projections, was questionable. The State pointed out that the project was not scrutinised by the Tamil Nadu State Coastal Zone Management Authority so far.
Coastal Regulation Zone clearance was required for the sand pit cutting to a length of 0.8 km at Dhanushkodi and for the construction of ancillary facilities for the building and operation of the channel. Furthermore, it said, the alignment 4A required a revised clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests as it varied from the original alignment 6.
The State said, “Ram Setu is an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use, which is representative of a culture or cultures or human interaction with the environment. It contains superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance.”
In the light of the committee’s report on the environmental hazards, it was unlikely that the project would be in public interest.
Therefore, it was of utmost importance that Ram Setu be declared a national monument, the State said. “No efforts have been made to conserve the bridge either by the Archaeological Survey of India or by the Government of India. Ram Setu passes the tests and authenticity criteria fixed by UNESCO to nominate the bridge as a world heritage site.” The State also drew the court’s attention to a letter written by the Chief Minister to the Prime Minister in March, on the importance of declaring Ram Setu a national monument.
SC extends deadline for Centre’s decision on Ram Sethu project
New Delhi: The Supreme Court today granted another six weeks to government to apprise it of its stand on the controversial Sethusamudram project about which a high-level committee has said that an alternative alignment, other than the one through mythological Ram Sethu, is not economically and ecologically feasible.
A bench of justices H L Dattu and C K Prasad gave more time to the government to make its stand on the project and posted the case for further hearing to December 3.
Representational image. AFP.
The case relating to Ram Sethu had come under judicial scrutiny due to a batch of petitions filed in the apex court against the ambitious Sethusamudram project, whose execution allegedly could damage the mythological bridge.
Sethusamudram project is aimed at constructing a shorter navigational route around India’s southern tip by breaching the Ram Sethu, said to have been built by Lord Rama’s army of monkeys and bears to Ravana’s kingdom Lanka.
As per the Sethusamudram project, the shipping channel is proposed to be 30 metres wide, 12 metres deep and 167 kms long. The Prime Minister had appointed the committee after the apex court had asked the government to explore an alternative alignment for the shipping channel to prevent damage to the Sethu.
The committee, in its report, had raised questions on the alternative alignment after taking into account various aspects including it’s economic and ecological assessment.
Appointed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the panel, headed by eminent environmentalist R K Pachauri, had analysed various aspects and said the alternative route aimed at protecting Ram Sethu, also called Adams Bridge, was not an acceptable option and not in public interest.
PTI